On 09/24/2015 03:45 PM, paul.hermeneu...@gmail.com wrote:
 >> I'm suprised. Why not just:
 >>
 >> list(str(results))
 >>
 >> In other words, is there something else the list constructor should do
 >> with a string other than convert it to a list?
 >>
 > The OP wanted the result to be a list of ints, not a list of strings.

[int(x) for x in list(str(results))]

Side note : strings are already iterable, the list function is superfluous.


jm


--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to