[Michael Sparks] | Phil Hunt wrote: | | > Kamaelia seems it might be an interesting project. However, I don't | > think the project is well served by this announcement -- which I | > find vague and hard to understand. Which is a shame, because it | > means that other people probably don't understand it very well | > either, which means less people will use it. | | It is a shame, and thanks for mentioning this. Let me have another | go :-) (ripping to shreds welcome :) | | OK, here's a better go. (It's always difficult to think where to pitch | this sort of thing)
[... snip ...] I just wanted to say that I find the ideas behind Kamaelia interesting, and I only wish I had an application for it! Because I'm not especially into media-streaming, I'm more interested in it from the point of view of the generator-based architecture. What prompted me to write now was in appreciation of Michael's taking the effort to recast his words into a form which might well be understood better by others (including me) when he might well have simply huffed a bit and told the other poster to read the words on the site and stop complaining about the HTML! Thanks, Michael. Hope the project continues apace and if I can ever find a need for it, I'll know where to look. Tim Golden ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
