On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's why I believe PEP 495 followed by the implementation > > of fold-aware "as intended" tzinfos (either within stdlib or by third > > parties) is the right approach. > > Me too - except I think acceptance of 495 should be contingent upon > someone first completing a fully functional (if not releasable) > fold-aware zoneinfo wrapping. Good idea. How far are you from completing that? > Details have a way of surprising, and > we should learn from the last time we released a tzinfo spec in the > absence of any industrial-strength wrappings using it. I completely agree. That's why I am adding test cases like Lord Hope Island and Vilnius to datetimetester. I will try to create a zoneinfo wrapping prototype as well, but I will probably "cheat" and build it on top of pytz.
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
