On Saturday 22 Aug 2015 20:03 CEST, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > On Saturday 22 Aug 2015 17:33 CEST, Michael Torrie wrote: > >> On 08/22/2015 05:37 AM, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >>>> I don't know. Is it bottle, or the browser, or something >>>> completely different that eats the extra time? >>> >>> I really do not know. I suspect bottle, but I am new to this, so I >>> value the suspicion of someone who has more experience more. :-D >> >> These are requests performed from browser Javascript (ajax), right? >> Could you write a shell script that fetches these urls in sequence >> using curl or wget, simulating the web browser? This would let you >> check times in a controlled way, without the variable of the >> browser itself. > > I should have thought about that myself. :-(
I used Python instead of a shell script of-course. :-P ======================================================================== #!/usr/bin/env python3 import time from urllib.request import urlopen server = 'http://localhost:8080' urls = [ '/', '/static/css/default.css', '/static/JavaScript/angular.js', '/static/appPublishedPhotos.js', '/links/data', '/versionPython', '/versionSQLite', ] for x in range(0, 10): start_time = time.time() for url in urls: print(url) urlopen(server + url).read() end_time = time.time() print('It took {0} seconds\n'.format(end_time - start_time), flush = True) time.sleep(20) ======================================================================== It is not perfect code, no error checking and the last sleep is superfluous, but for the current job good enough. I have included the output as attachment. It is clear that bottle is not the problem: fetching all the data takes at most 0.017 seconds.
/ /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.012779951095581055 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.010144948959350586 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.010040283203125 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.013696908950805664 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.01705002784729004 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.009366750717163086 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.011032581329345703 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.015336990356445312 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.016999244689941406 seconds / /static/css/default.css /static/JavaScript/angular.js /static/appPublishedPhotos.js /links/data /versionPython /versionSQLite It took 0.010639429092407227 seconds
So my next bet is AngularJS. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
