On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:26:50 PM UTC-5, Jason Swails wrote: > I know my experiences don't hold true for everybody, but I > also don't think they are uncommon (I know several > colleagues that share many aspects of them). And for me, > the *better* Python 2.7 becomes, and the longer it's kept > around, the easier (and more fun!) it makes my transition > to Python 3. So for me at least, arguments like "don't > make Python 2.7 too good or people won't switch" are not > only wrong, but in actuality counter-productive.
Thanks for sharing your story. You offer a compelling argument for maintaining Py2.x in peak condition for many years. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
