On Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 12:28:19 PM UTC+5:30, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Rustom Mody wrote: > > Ive known good ones) most practicing-mathematicians proceed on the > > assumption > > that they *discover* math and not that they *invent* it. > > For something purely abstract like mathematics, I don't > see how there's any distinction between "discovering" and > "inventing". They're two words for the same thing. > > I don't know what kind of -ist that makes me...
By some strange coincidence, a colleague just sent me this article on the mathematician John Horton Conway: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/23/john-horton-conway-the-most-charismatic-mathematician-in-the-world In which is this paragraph: -------------------------- "Conway is the rare sort of mathematician whose ability to connect his pet mathematical interests makes one wonder if he isn't, at some level, shaping mathematical reality and not just exploring it," James Propp, a professor of mathematics at the University of Massachusetts Lowell, once told me. "The example of this that I know best is a connection he discovered between sphere packing and games. These were two separate areas of study that Conway had arrived at by two different paths. So there's no reason for them to be linked. But somehow, through the force of his personality, and the intensity of his passion, he bent the mathematical universe to his will." -------------------------- -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
