On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>
wrote:
> Despite the title, this is not one of the usual "Why can't Python do
> maths?" "bug" reports.
>
> Can anyone reproduce this behaviour? If so, please reply with the version
> of
> Python and your operating system. Printing sys.version will probably do.
>
>
> x = 1 - 1/2**53
> assert x == 0.9999999999999999
> for i in range(1, 1000000):
> if int(i*x) == i:
> print(i); break
>
>
> Using Jython and IronPython, the loop runs to completion. That is the
> correct behaviour, or so I am lead to believe. Using Python 2.6, 2.7 and
> 3.3 on Centos and Debian, it prints 2049 and breaks. That should not
> happen. If you can reproduce that (for any value of i, not necessarily
> 2049), please reply.
>
As others have suggested, this is almost certainly a 32-bit vs. 64-bit
issue. Consider the following C program:
// maths.h
#include <math.h>
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
double x;
int i;
x = 1-pow(0.5, 53);
for (i = 1; i < 1000000; i++) {
if ((int)(i*x) == i) {
printf("%d\n", i);
break;
}
}
return 0;
}
For the most part, this should be as close to an exact transliteration of
your Python code as possible.
Here's what I get when I try compiling and running it on my 64-bit (Gentoo)
Linux machine with 32-bit compatible libs:
swails@batman ~/test $ gcc maths.c
swails@batman ~/test $ ./a.out
swails@batman ~/test $ gcc -m32 maths.c
swails@batman ~/test $ ./a.out
2049
That this happens at the C level in 32-bit mode is highly suggestive, I
think, since I believe these are the actual machine ops that CPython float
maths execute under the hood.
All the best,
Jason
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
