In a message of Sun, 21 Jun 2015 10:29:32 +0100, BartC writes: >It also puts in a good dig at PyPy by including one benchmark where it >is 6 times as slow as CPython! > >It's not clear why it's particularly useful for astrophysics. > >-- >Bartc
It's not that good a dig, as they say that it took less than 1 second to run most of their benchmarks, which mostly means that the PyPy JIT won't have started to run anyway. One can argue that HOPE isn't actually a method JIT at all -- or if it is one, then so is Cython. Laura -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
