On Mon, 8 Jun 2015 06:56 am, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > You really should follow the references and brush up your math.
You really should stop being patronising to everyone and pay attention to what is actually being said. If you won't believe us, and you won't believe mathematics, perhaps you will believe a simulation. import random def trial(size): return [random.randint(1, 9) for i in range(size)] def test(trial_size, test_size): every_element_seen = 0 for i in range(test_size): s = set(trial(trial_size)) if len(s) == 9: every_element_seen += 1 return every_element_seen/test_size msg = "Pr(every element seen at least once) in %d trials" for size in range(10, 100, 5): print(msg % size, end=' ') pr = test(size, 1000) print(pr) When I run this simulation, I get: Pr(every element seen at least once) in 10 trials 0.007 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 15 trials 0.109 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 20 trials 0.349 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 25 trials 0.6 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 30 trials 0.765 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 35 trials 0.868 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 40 trials 0.917 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 45 trials 0.953 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 50 trials 0.976 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 55 trials 0.981 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 60 trials 0.996 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 65 trials 0.999 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 70 trials 0.997 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 75 trials 1.0 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 80 trials 0.998 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 85 trials 1.0 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 90 trials 1.0 Pr(every element seen at least once) in 95 trials 1.0 -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list