On 2015-06-02, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sorry. I meant "object" in the sense of OOP: something you might
>>> extend or make a derived class with.
>>
>> I'm not sure you get to define which properties of objects you want
>> not to count.
>
> Accepting for the sake of argument that "something to be subclassed"
> is a reasonable definition of object,
Huh? You can't subclass an object. You can subclass a Class.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I want to so HAPPY,
at the VEINS in my neck STAND
gmail.com OUT!!
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
