Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>: > On Fri, 29 May 2015 12:00 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > [...] >> in a language where classes are >> themselves values, there is no reason why a class must be instantiated, >> particularly if you're only using a single instance of the class. Anyone >> ever come across a named design pattern that involves using classes >> directly without instantiating them? >> >> I'm basically looking for a less inelegant term for "instanceless class" >> -- not so much a singleton as a zeroton. > > C# has these, and calls them static classes.
I guess Python has them, too, and calls them modules. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
