On Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 4:16:02 PM UTC+5:30, BartC wrote: > On 01/06/2015 23:59, BartC wrote: > > >> In the new class style, type and class sort of mean the same thing. > > > > I'm developing a new language along the lines of Python, > > (After reading some of the rest of the sub-thread, I'm glad I reined in > some of the proposed changes to my existing language to make it more > Python-like. > > If my simple, no-nonsense approach can avoid discussions about > philosophy, religion and meta-physics (or whatever the hell the > sub-thread was about) then that must be a good thing!)
What is good that each one can only decide in his own private space. What is historical is public and studying that history would show that these questions are central to the existence of our field, [Mark's views nowithstanding] http://blog.languager.org/2015/03/cs-history-0.html -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
