Op Monday 1 Jun 2015 20:42 CEST schreef Laura Creighton: > In a message of Mon, 01 Jun 2015 18:44:01 +0200, Cecil Westerhof > writes: >> Op Monday 1 Jun 2015 17:44 CEST schreef Laura Creighton: >> >>> In a message of Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:44:34 +0200, Cecil Westerhof >>> writes: >>>> Also the funny thing is that I first scanned it. But it gave >>>> several problems. One of them was that it is a format between A4 >>>> and A5. Taking pictures is faster and gives better results. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cecil Westerhof >>>> Senior Software Engineer >>>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof >>> >>> My irony detector may be on the fritz today, but, well, if you run >>> into some weird format between A4 and A5, you probably have a USA >>> size. see: >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paper_size#North_American_paper_sizes >> >> Nope, the dimensions are 177 mm x 227 mm. >> >> -- >> Cecil Westerhof >> Senior Software Engineer >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof >> -- >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > Truly? That's (very close to) 7 inch by 9 inch, 177.8 mm x 228.6 mm > and 7 by 9 is what pre-metric Britian called 'Small Post Quarto'. > I wonder if this merely a coincidence, or does some software really > still like this size? How very weird.
Well, it is possible I did not measure correctly. ;-) It is a 32 page booklet. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
