Dark Cowherd wrote: > -Quote - Phillip J. Eby from dirtsimple.org > Python as a community is plagued by massive amounts of > wheel-reinvention. The infamous web framework proliferation problem is > just the most egregious example. > > Why is Python "blessed" with so much reinvention? Because it's often > cheaper to rewrite than to reuse. Python code is easy to write, but > hard to depend on. You pretty much have to: > > 1. limit yourself to platforms with a suitable packaging system, > 2. bundle all your dependencies into your distribution, or > 3. make your users do all the work themselves > > Ouch. No wonder rewriting looks easier. The only way to stop this > trend is to make it easier to reuse than to rewrite, which has been my > mission with setuptools and EasyInstall > -UnQuote
I think that Phillip misrepresents the problem a little bit, because it is not true that there are too few reusable components that need just another hero programmer like himself or anyone of us to implement. What is missing is just a simple distinction that does not exist in an open source community guided by hackers at least not on a certain level ( the PEP process would be a counter-example ) but is well known in contemporary industry practice: some people are just writing specs. SUN with Java for example employs people that model systems and write API specs that are finally licenced and implemented by 3rd-party vendors. J2EE or the JavaCard API are prominent examples. This is very different from the just-for-fun or heroic-hacker attitude due to spare-time programmers who create a bit of code they are interested in and leaving the rest aside. It's not all just marketing blabla that makes Javas success. Kay -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
