On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 5:13 AM, <zljubisic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> If I find an error in command line parameters section I cannot call function >> usage() because it is not defined yet. >> >> I have few options here: >> 1. Put definition of usage function before command line parameters >> parsing section > > I'd do this, unless there's a good reason not to. A simple usage > function probably doesn't have many dependencies, so it can logically > go high in the code. As a general rule, I like to organize code such > that things are defined higher up than they're used; it's not strictly > necessary (if they're used inside functions, the requirement is only > that they be defined before the function's called), but it helps with > clarity. That generally means that "def usage():" wants to go up above > any place where "usage()" occurs, but below the definitions of any > functions that usage() itself calls, and below the first assignments > to any global names it uses. It's not always possible, but when it is, > it tends to produce an easy-to-navigate source file.
+1. Also, I like to put command-line parsing inside the main function and make that its *only* responsibility. The main function then calls the real entry point of my script, which will be something more specifically named. This also has the advantage that if some other module needs to invoke my script, all it has to do is call the entry point function which will be named something more suitable than "main". -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
