On Tue, 12 May 2015 02:43 am, zipher wrote: > For example, have you ever contemplated this: > > class WeightedVertex(vertex_common(Vertex(dict))): > """test class"""
No. > That currently isn't valid Python code, Yes it is. You just have to arrange matters so that vertex_common(Vertex(dict)) returns a type. > but the idea is that I'm making > composite objects that expand one upon the other -- another basic idea in > the realm of theoretical OOP that this boneheaded community couldn't wrap > it's head around. Yes, I'm sure that from where you are floating around in space way beyond the stratosphere, we must all look like feeble-minded ants. http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html But at least we know what is valid Python and what isn't. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
