On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote:
> def loop(func, funcname, arg):
> start = time.time()
> for i in range(repeats):
> func(arg, True)
> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start))
>
> start = time.time()
> for i in range(repeats):
> func(arg)
> print("{0}({1}) took {2:7.4}".format(funcname, arg, time.time()-start))
Note that you're explicitly passing True in one case but leaving the
default in the other. I don't know whether that might be responsible
for the difference you're seeing.
Also, it's best to use the timeit module for timing code, e.g.:
>>> from timeit import Timer
>>> t1 = Timer("factorial_iterative(100000, False)", "from __main__ import
>>> factorial_iterative")
>>> t1.repeat(10, number=1)
[3.8517245299881324, 3.7571076710009947, 3.7780062559759244,
3.848508063936606, 3.7627131739864126, 3.8278848479967564,
3.776115525048226, 3.83024005102925, 3.8322679550619796,
3.8195601429324597]
>>> min(_), sum(_) / len(_)
(3.7571076710009947, 3.8084128216956743)
>>> t2 = Timer("factorial_iterative(100000, True)", "from __main__ import
>>> factorial_iterative")
>>> t2.repeat(10, number=1)
[3.8363616950809956, 3.753201302024536, 3.7838632150087506,
3.7670978900277987, 3.805312803015113, 3.7682680500438437,
3.856655619922094, 3.796431727008894, 3.8224815409630537,
3.765664782957174]
>>> min(_), sum(_) / len(_)
(3.753201302024536, 3.7955338626052253)
As you can see, in my testing the True case was actually marginally
(probably not significantly) faster in both the min and the average.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
