On 2015-05-03, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > There's also a mistake in this bit: > > """ > # Note that according to the \uXXXX escaping convention, a supplemental > character (> 0x10FFFF) is represented > # by a sequence of two surrogate characters: the first between D800 and > DBFF, and the second between DC00 and DFFF. > """
Do you mean that it should say "(> 0xFFFF)" ? Far be it from me to correct the Unicode Consortium on the subject of Unicode ;-) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
