On Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 6:38:28 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 10:59 PM, vasudevram <vasudev...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Re. statement of fact vs. hypotheses. While I'm not sure of your exact > > meaning in that paragraph, I understand the concept, and yes, I was not > > clear enough in phrasing that part. It should have read like something > > along these lines: > > > > Observations -> One or more hypotheses -> deductions -> one or more > > alternative conclusions. > > I just took a glance at your blog post, and it's reasonably clear now. > (Though I tend to try to avoid making substantive edits to blog posts > once they've been published and read; a codicil, or at very least an > italicized comment saying "(Edit: Actually, blah blah blah.)", is > clearer. Of course, trivial edits like typos can be corrected - nobody > would be bothered by those unexpectedly changing.) Posts to the > newsgroup/mailing list basically can't be edited, so the normal way to > acknowledge an error or correction is simply a follow-up post. > > ChrisA
Good points, thanks. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
