>> I give up. > > > So do I, I think, if no-one is willing to admit that the original way of > implementing range() was a glaring mistake. > > > -- > Bartc > It doesn't matter for small ranges. Anyway it was fixed. > > > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-- Joel Goldstick http://joelgoldstick.com -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
