On 2015-04-30, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote: > Finally, I did some testing on Jon Ribben's version. His was > substantially faster for smaller sets, and about the same for 10*7. So > it's likely it'll be slower than yours and mine for 10**8.
You know what they say about assumptions. Actually, my version is six times faster for 10**8 (running under Python 3.4). > But the real reason I didn't like it was it produced a much larger > set of happy_numbers, which could clog memory a lot sooner. For > 10**7 items, I had 3250 happy members, and 19630 unhappy. And Jon > had 1418854 happy members. Er, what? You're complaining that mine is less efficient by not producing the wrong output? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
