On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:59:51 -0700 (PDT), Jerry He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
> Is it possible to create a function that you can use
>without parenthesizing the arguments? for example, for
>
>def examine(str):
> .....
> .....
>
>Is there some way to define it so that I can call it
>like
>
>examine "string"
>instead of examine("string")?
>
I suggested in a previous thread that one could support such a syntax by
supporting an invisible binary operator between two expressions, so that
examine "string" translates to examine.__invisbinop__("string") if
examine as an expression evaluates to an object that has a __invisbinop__
method.
Then you wouldn't define examine as a function, you would define it as an
instance
of a class like
class Examine(object):
define __invisbinop__(self, other):
#...whatever
examine = Examine()
and then
examine "string"
Of course this is a strange syntax mod to the language, and undoubtedly
would have many strange effects, but superficially, it seems like something
could be done. But a consequence of white space as potential invisible operator
would be that foo() and foo () might be foo.__call__() vs foo.__invisbinop_(())
Regards,
Bengt Richter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
