On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote: > 2b. John, thank you for describing your experience and making the > community's picture of the current overall state of Python 3 more > accurate. It was apparently a bit too rosy before, and we should avoid > fostering unrealistic expectations in the future.
Not without some evidence of where this "a bit too rosy" picture came from. So far, we've had rebuttals of vaguenesses, which pretty much amount to FUD. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
