John Nagle <na...@animats.com> writes: > The Python 3 documentation at > https://docs.python.org/3/howto/webservers.html > > recommends "flup"
I disagree. In a section where it describes FastCGI, it presents a tiny example as a way to test the packages installed. The example happens to use ‘flup’. That's quite different from a recommendation. > I get the feeling, again, that nobody actually uses this stuff. > […] > I keep thinking I'm almost done with Python 3 hell, but then I > get screwed by Python 3 again. You have found yet another poorly-maintained package which is not at all the responsibility of Python 3. Why are you discussing it as though Python 3 is at fault? What do you expect to change *about Python 3* that would address the perceived problem? Whose responsibility is it to do that? -- \ “Oh, I love your magazine. My favorite section is ‘How To | `\ Increase Your Word Power’. That thing is really, really, | _o__) really... good.” —Homer, _The Simpsons_ | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
