On 03/23/2015 07:49 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Dave Angel <da...@davea.name> wrote:
On the other hand, my loop makes some non-obvious assumptions, like that
append is always the right place to put a new value.

Yes, I had to stop and think about that one a bit. And that strongly
suggests (to me, at least!) that it's comment-worthy :)


It's funny. I thought of commenting it, but wanted to wait till I checked whether I could call fib+fib in the opposite order. By the time i realized they both worked fine i forgot to enter the comment. (Note; missing comment is usually not as bad as inaccurate comment)

Repeat to self:  comment first, then write test, then write the code.

Reply to self:  Maybe next time.


--
DaveA
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to