On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> wrote: > > I was actually referring to the offered API. It still seems to me like > all iterators could offer close(), send() and throw(). Why? To make all > iterators drop-in replacements of each other. > > Then, you could also stop wondering what to call the thingy returned by > a generator. Why, it would be an iterator. You wouldn't then have any > other use for a generator than the function that returns an iterator.
That just adds unnecessary overhead to every iterator. Also, what happens when you throw something into iter([1,2,3]) ? Or send it a value? What happens? ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
