On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:03 AM, Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > What I was trying to say expanded here > http://blog.languager.org/2015/03/whimsical-unicode.html > [Hope the word 'whimsical' is less jarring and more accurate than > 'gibberish']
Re footnote #4: ½ is a single character for compatibility reasons. ⅟₁₀₀ doesn't need to be a single character, because there are countably infinite vulgar fractions and only 0x110000 Unicode characters. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
