On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote: > Mark Lawrence wrote: > >> Reading the bug report http://bugs.python.org/issue23515, specifically >> msg236586, it looks as if the proposed fix was wrong and one of the >> smarter members of the python community fixed it. > > If I understand that correctly Benjamin's modifications don't affect the > functionality of the patch.
Yeah, just looks like some changes for code clarity to me. Py_ssize_t is signed, so the n-1 > 0 test wouldn't break on n = 0. The other changes are pure formatting. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
