Laura Creighton <l...@openend.se> wrote: >I don't understand 'an interpreter rather than a JIT'. PyPy has a >JIT, that sort of is the whole point.
Yes. I meant that from my end-user, non-software-engineer perspective, it looked as though CPython was proceeding with leaps and bounds and that PyPy remained mostly a proof-of-concept after several years. But thanks for your description of the issues. So once the core issues are sorted out, if enough people can be found to work on it, then hopefully the library conversions will follow apace. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
