In article <9a2cf6ca-2eb8-4a87-9e83-e87d90d5f...@googlegroups.com>, andre.robe...@gmail.com says... > > **This is a follow up from a previous discussion in which it is argued > that the following code produces the correct error message terminology ** > > I pointed out to you that the word object WAS used correctly: hence, the > correct terminology was used in that error message. > > You are just wasting people's time.
That is just rude! I'm still trying to understand what is the problem you are having with my post. Have you followed the previous thread? Is there anything you are not understanding? People were saying to me that in Python object = instance. I'm trying to argue why I believe it isn't and asking for arguments to convince me otherwise. And that's the best you can do? Python does imply that an object is an instance, btw. It is why I got that answer from more than one person. Or so they say. By referring to an instance of Sub as "Sub object", there's an implicit affirmation that an object is an instance. Bye. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
