On 22/01/2015 19:25, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> writes:
Since the "language wars" of the 1990s, dynamic languages have won.
Are you kidding? Nothing has won, the wars are still going on, and
dynamic and static typing both have their winning use cases and will be
around forever.
Unless you offer a new language that is absolutely guaranteed to have
the best of both worlds, in which case there'd be major flame wars over
whether you'd call it dynatically or stamically typed.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
