On 20/01/2015 05:19, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk>:
On 19/01/2015 22:06, Zachary Gilmartin wrote:
Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
Probably because you'd never get agreement as to which specific tree
and which specific implementation was the most suitable for inclusion.
Most programming languages provide one standard sorted mapping
implementation.
I'd have thought it would be the standard library and not the language
that provided a sorted mapping. Are you also saying that this has to be
implemented as a tree, such that this has to be provided by cPython,
Jython, IronPython, Pypy and so on and so forth?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
