On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Gregory Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > Ruby doesn't have that problem because it doesn't > have functions, only methods, and the only thing you > can do with a method in Ruby is call it.
So functions aren't first-class objects in Ruby? Bleh. I've become quite accustomed to passing them around casually, in several languages. Even C lets you pass function pointers around. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
