On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> wrote: > Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: > >> ... what you said There's no way to guarantee to keep calling the >> function. You have to depend on upstream. > > The caveats I listed are real concerns for the modern-day programmer. > However, they are of a different nature than the complaint against > time.monotonic().
But they're also reasons you can't have Python code around the problem. Anyway, it's only an issue for one platform, and only for some versions of it; basically, if you're targeting anything other than Windows XP, you should be able to use time.monotonic() without concerns. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
