Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com>: > >> Likewise in 2014, and given the arguments, inconsistencies, etc >> remembering the nuts-n-bolts below the strings-represented-as-unicode >> abstraction may be in order. > > No need to hide Unicode, but talking about a > > Unicode string > > is like talking about an > > electronic computer
versus a hydraulic computer, a mechanical computer, an optical computer, a human computer, a genetic (DNA) computer, ... > visible spectrum display I'm not sure that many people actually do refer to "visible spectrum display", or what you mean by it, but I can easily imagine that being in contrast with a non-visible spectrum display. > mouse user interface As opposed to a commandline user interface, direct brain-to-computer user interface, touch UI, etc. Not to mention non-user interfaces, like SCSI interface, SATA interface, USB interface, ... > ethernet socket Telephone socket, Appletalk socket, Firewire socket, ADB socket ... > magnetic file I have no idea what you mean here. Do you mean magnetic *field*? As opposed to an electric field, gravitational field, Higgs field, strong nuclear force field, weak nuclear force field ... > electric power supply > > The language spec calls the things just "strings," as it should. I really don't understand what bothers you about this. In Python, we have Unicode strings and byte strings. In computing in general, strings can consist of Unicode characters, ASCII characters, Tron characters, EBCDID characters, ISO-8859-7 characters, and literally dozens of others. It boogles my mind that you are so opposed to being explicit about what sort of string we are dealing with. Are you equally disturbed when people distinguish between tablespoon, teaspoon, dessert spoon and serving spoon? -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
