Duncan Booth wrote: > I would have expected a > path object to be a sequence of path elements rather than a sequence of > characters.
Maybe it's nitpicking, but I don't think that a path object should be a 'sequence of path elements' in an iterator context. This means that for element in pathobject: has no intuitive meaning for me, so it shouldn't be allowed. Daniel -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
