Duncan Booth wrote:
>  I would have expected a 
> path object to be a sequence of path elements rather than a sequence of 
> characters. 

Maybe it's nitpicking, but I don't think that a path object should be a 
'sequence of path elements' in an iterator context.

This means that

for element in pathobject:

has no intuitive meaning for me, so it shouldn't be allowed.

Daniel
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to