On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 11:10:06 AM UTC+5:30, Zachary Ware wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> > Maybe nicer to filter out the false's with a filter-false thus??
> >
> > def ff(d): return [n for n in d if d[n]]
>
> Sure. Or, combining things:
>
> try:
> from collections import abc
> except ImportError:
> import collections as abc
> from abc import ABCMeta
>
> abcs = [o for o in vars(abc).values() if isinstance(o, ABCMeta)]
>
> def get_abcs(cls):
> return [abc for abc in abcs if issubclass(cls, abc)]
>
> def get_abc_names(cls):
> return [abc.__name__ for abc in get_abcs(cls)]
>
>
>
> Of course, that's 3 (progressively shorter) loops to get the names of
> the ABCs of a class compared to 1 (fairly short in the first place)
> loop for a map of relationships to all available ABCs, but optimizing
> such a toy as this would just be an exercise in futility :)
Not so.
The charm of introspection is that the introspection
itself can be introspected.
For that to be convincing there needs to be a good combo
of clarity and succinctness. In particular why not reduce
the two functions to one?
def get_abc_names(cls):
return [abc.__name__ for abc in abcs if issubclass(cls,abc)]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
