On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Dan Stromberg <drsali...@gmail.com> wrote: > When you use heapq, are you putting all the values in the heap, or > just up to n at a time (evicting the worst value, one at a time as you > go)? If you're doing the former, it's basically a heapsort which > probably won't beat timsort. If you're doing the latter, that should > be pretty good.
It just occurred to me that evicting the highest value each step of the way might be expensive with a traditional heap (since the value at the largest array index isn't necessarily the largest). I've experimented with doing this using a treap a bit: http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/treap/ You might try that. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list