Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: > That's because, while you can *think of* Python name bindings as being > like dict key/value pairs, they aren't always that. Function locals, > class locals, and other such namespaces aren't necessarily implemented > with dicts. They're conceptually still a "dictionary" of sorts, but > you can't actually pass anyone a dict and key and expect it to work.
I see that as a glitch in the Matrix. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
