Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com>: > On 3/20/14 4:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> Well, with proper care, I suppose the same code base could support perl >> as well. ;) > > I'm not sure how to take this comment. I feel like you are mocking my > choice. I wanted to make coverage.py available to as broad an audience > as possible, something that I think is worthwhile. Yes, there was an > engineering cost, but the tradeoff was worth it.
I can't judge if your particular choice was the right one. My only point is that python2 and python3 are so far apart as to be regarded as independent languages. Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
