On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 1:18 AM, Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> Note that, technically, Grant is correct as long as you grant (heh) >> that a structure may have an invisible member, the virtual function >> table pointer. C++ only (I don't believe C has virtual functions - >> but it may have grown them in one of the newer standards), so in C, >> all members are public. > > Yes. I was talking about C, not C++. I made that quite clear in > portions of my post that have been elided. In C there is no such > thing as a virtual table pointer.
I wasn't certain of the newer C standards. C's been gaining all sorts of features, not all of which are necessary, and it's entirely possible based on my current knowledge that C specifies #include <antigravity> ... ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
