Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> writes: > On 2/27/2014 7:07 AM, Mark H. Harris wrote: > >> Oh, and one more thing... whoever is doing the work on IDLE these >> days, nice job! It is stable, reliable, and just works/ >> appreciate it! > > As one of 'them', thank you for the feedback. There are still some > bugs, but I hit them seldom enough that I am now looking at > enhancement issues.
I recently watched a presentation by Jessica McKellar of PSF about what Python needs to stay popular. Other than the obvious bits (difficulties or limited support of Python on major platforms like Windows and mobile) the slight lack of perfection in IDLE was mentioned. Specifically the old blog post titled "The Things I Hate About IDLE That I Wish Someone Would Fix" at http://inventwithpython.com/blog/2011/11/29/the-things-i-hate-about-idle-that-i-wish-someone-would-fix/ It lists 17 issues and some more in the comments. Are those things something that could be considered? Or have maybe been done already? I'm not an IDLE user so this is mostly an academic interest on my part. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list