On 2/8/14 9:56 PM, David Hutto wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Rustom Mody <rustompm...@gmail.com
<mailto:rustompm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On Sunday, February 9, 2014 4:15:50 AM UTC+5:30, David Hutto wrote:
> One could argue that if you're parsing a particular file, a very
large one, that those 9 bytes can go into the optimization of
parsing aforementioned file. Of, course we have faster processors,
so why care?
> Because it goes into the optimization of the code one is
'developing' in python.
Yes... There are cases when python is an inappropriate language to
use...
So???
I didn't say she couldn't optimize in another language, and was just
prototyping in Python. I just said she was optimizing her python
code...dufus.
Please keep the discussion respectful. Misunderstandings are easy, I
suspect this is one of them. There's no reason to start calling people
names.
Its good to get a bit of context here.
loop:
jmf says python is inappropriate.
Someone asks him: Is it? In what case?
jmf: No answer
After a delay of few days jmp to start of loop
loop:
mov head,up_your_ass
push repeat
pop repeat
jmp loop
Please keep in mind the Code of Conduct:
http://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
Thanks.
[BTW: In my book this classic trolling]
--
And the title of this book would be..."Pieces of Cliche Bullshit
Internet Arguments for Dummies"
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
/*CEO:*/ _http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com_
--
Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
