On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02/04/2014 08:21 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Useless and really ugly. > > How do you recommend we discover the anchor links for linking to?
Same way you usually do! By right clicking, hitting "View Source", and poking around until you find the right place! I've done exactly that with innumerable web sites. It's a massive luxury to have them explicitly published like that; as well as the convenience, it gives an impression (whether that's true or false) that the hash links are deemed important and will therefore be maintained in the future (unlike, say, a system that has "http://..../....#s4"; for the fourth (or fifth) section - inserting a section above this one will break my link) ChrisA . -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
