On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Robin Becker <ro...@reportlab.com> wrote: > On 16/01/2014 00:32, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >>> >>> >Or are you saying thatwww.unicode.org is wrong about the definitions of >>> >Unicode terms? >> >> No, I think he is saying that he doesn't know Unicode anywhere near as >> well as he thinks he does. The question is, will he cherish his >> ignorance, or learn from this thread? > > > I assure you that I fully understand my ignorance of unicode. Until recently > I didn't even know that the unicode in python 2.x is considered broken and > that str in python 3.x is considered 'better'.
Your wisdom, if I may paraphrase Master Foo, is that you know you are a fool. http://catb.org/esr/writings/unix-koans/zealot.html ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
