On Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:34:30 PM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote: > In article <mailman.5355.1389500996.18130.python-l...@python.org>, > > "W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > > > > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something > > > like: > > > > > > > > for val in range(25): > > > > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > > > > > > > The loop will break after the first failure. Anyone have a good > > > > approach for this? please advise. > > > > > > If Python 3.4 is an option, you can stick to the standard library and > > > use subtests [1]. > > > > Or, as yet another alternative, if you use nose, you can write test > > generators. > > > > https://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/writing_tests.html#test-generators
Thank you all for the feedback. I now have what I need. Cheers On Saturday, January 11, 2014 11:34:30 PM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote: > In article <mailman.5355.1389500996.18130.python-l...@python.org>, > > "W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 08:00:05PM -0800, CraftyTech wrote: > > > > I'm finding it hard to use unittest in a for loop. Perhaps something > > > like: > > > > > > > > for val in range(25): > > > > self.assertEqual(val,5,"not equal) > > > > > > > > The loop will break after the first failure. Anyone have a good > > > > approach for this? please advise. > > > > > > If Python 3.4 is an option, you can stick to the standard library and > > > use subtests [1]. > > > > Or, as yet another alternative, if you use nose, you can write test > > generators. > > > > https://nose.readthedocs.org/en/latest/writing_tests.html#test-generators -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
