On 06/01/2014 22:22, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 1/6/14 5:08 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/01/2014 21:42, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 1/6/14 4:33 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/01/2014 21:17, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 16:16:13 Terry Reedy did opine:
On 1/6/2014 9:32 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And from my lurking here, its quite plain to me that 3.x python
has a
problem with everyday dealing with strings.
Strings of what? And what specific 'everyday' problem are you
referring
to?
Strings start a new thread here at nominally weekly intervals. Seems
to me
that might be usable info.
Cheers, Gene
That strikes me as being as useful as "The PEP 393 FSR is completely
wrong but I'm not going to tell you why" approach.
Please stop baiting people.
What are you on about? The comment has been made that "its quite plain
to me that 3.x python has a problem with everyday dealing with strings".
Myself, Terry Reedy and Steven D'Aprano have all commented on this,
asking for more data. We've been given nothing, which is precisely what
our resident unicode expert has given us.
I'm on about your comment being a gratuitous jab at someone who isn't
even participating in the thread. Stop it.
You arrogance really has no bounds. If you'd have done the job that you
should have done in the first place and stopped that blithering idiot 16
months ago, we wouldn't still be putting up with him now. To top that,
you're now defending "customers" when you should be saying quite clearly
that PEP 404 stands as is and THERE WILL BE NO PYTHON 2.8. Have I made
my message perfectly clear?
And as I started this thread, I'll say what I please, throwing my toys
out of my pram in just the same way that your pal Armin is currently doing.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
