Paul Boddie wrote: > "Robert Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Daniel Bickett wrote: > > > I neglected to mention an important fact, and that is the > > > fact that I am limited to Apache, which elminates several > > > suggestions (that are appreciated none-the-less). > > > > Do you have access to mod_python, mod_rewrite, FastCGI, or > > SCGI? Then CherryPy 2.1 is still a great option for you with > > Apache: > > http://www.cherrypy.org/wiki/WSGIServers > > http://www.cherrypy.org/wiki/BehindApache > > According to the "quick facts" page "CherryPy powered web > applications are in fact stand-alone Python applications embedding > their own multi-threaded web server", suggesting that if the hosting > environment is "limited to Apache" and if this can also be taken to > mean that the environment doesn't permit long-running server processes > apart from Apache, then CherryPy isn't likely to be suitable.
Thanks for pointing that out; that page was out of date, and has now been corrected: http://www.cherrypy.org/wiki/CherryPyQuickFacts . CherryPy 2.1 apps can be deployed using Apache (via mod_python) or IIS (via ASP) as the webserver *without* running the webserver built into CherryPy. In fact, CherryPy should work with any WSGI-capable webserver, and be deployable in a wide variety of hosting environments with no changes to your application code. Robert Brewer System Architect Amor Ministries [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
