"Thomas Lotze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > > Basically, I agree with the "make it run, make it right, make it fast" > attitude. However, FWIW, I sometimes can't resist optimizing routines that > probably don't strictly need it. Not only does the resulting code run > faster, but it is usually also shorter and more readable and expressive. > Plus, I tend to gain further insight into the problem and tools in the > process. YMMV, of course.
Shorter, more readable and expressive are laudable goals in and of themselves. Most of the "advice" on optimization assumes that after optimization, routines will be less readable and expressive, not more. In other words, I wouldn't call the activity of making a routine more readable and expressive of intent "optimization." If it runs faster, that's a bonus. It frequently will, at least if you don't add method calls to the process. John Roth > > -- > Thomas > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
