On 22/12/2013 22:51, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Frank Cui <y...@outlook.com> wrote:
Thanks for pointing out. I accept your advice and will try to make the
questions clearer and more straightforward to interpretate . I already took
the suggestion of using exception-based handling over the return code.
As to testing whether the previous function fails or succeeds, this doesn't
really matter in the sense that I already mentioned a return code of 0.
Ranting Rick is one of the list's resident trolls. Don't take it amiss
that he turned his flamethrowers on you. :)
ChrisA
Given that Frank originally stated this
"
I have a requirement where I need to sequentially execute a bunch of
executions, each execution has a return code. the followed executions
should only be executed if the return code is 0. is there a cleaner or
more pythonic way to do this other than the following ?
if a() == 0:
if b() == 0:
c()
"
I can only see one way that you can possibly intepret it. Perhaps rr
was dashing off a reply on a mobile device while doing a home run, hence
wasn't concentrating on what Frank had actually said?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
